A PROTESTANT FAMILY NEWSPAPER
(December 1999 Issue)
This book has stirred up bitter controversy in Orange circles and
beyond. Initiation into the Royal Arch Purple Order is by the Royal Arch
Purple degree, which is not officially recognised by the Loyal Orange
Institution (LOI) in Ireland although many members of the LOI in other
countries. It is also recognised by the Independent Loyal Orange
Institution (ILOI). The alleged details of the ritual are revealed in the
book.
The author seeks to show that the ritual of the Royal Arch Purple
degree is derived from Freemasonry, that some of the symbolism is demonic,
that the oaths taken and the ensuing obligation to secrecy are wrong, that
the ceremonial is physically and spiritually degrading, that it offers an
alternative method of salvation and that Christians should therefore have
nothing to do with it. The reader is even provided with a sample
resignation letter.
The Royal Arch Purplemen reply that the details as described in the
book are selective and inaccurate and that such are the dangers facing
Protestants today that binding oaths are not wrong. Mr. George Dawson,
Imperial Grand Master of the ILOI, accuses the author of peddling in
"half truths, fairy stories and blatant nonsense." Mr. Dawson
tells of a man converted through the degree. He argues that what the
symbols mean to Royal Arch Purplemen is not decided by what they mean to
some other people. The fact that certain aspects of Orangeism are alleged
similar certain aspects of Freemasonry, which in turn are alleged to be
similar to certain aspects of witchcraft, does not prove that Orangeism is
witchcraft. Alleged similarity is not proof of identity.
The statements in the book are startling but we get the impression that
the side people take in this controversy is decided as much by what they
feel about the Orange Order as by any revelations in the book.
Readers will decide for themselves.
P. Ferguson.
Back to reviews
Email us
|