ROYAL ARCH PURPLE ORDER DEFENDED
(Issue 28)
Dear Editor,
As a regular reader of Ulster Christian I read with interest your
review of the book "Behind Closed Doors."
I have never been a member of the Royal Arch Purple Chapter but I can
speak as a lecturer within the Independent Loyal Orange Institution and
for the degree practised there. However, it may interest you to learn
that, far from being secretive, the Royal Arch Purple Chapter itself
published a book outlining its origins and practices. This book is
selectively quoted by Mr Malcomson in his work.
I am surprised and disappointed at the lack of knowledge of the subject
betrayed by your reviewer and his blind acceptance of information
presented in "Behind Closed Doors" The opinions expressed by
your reviewer are not confined to the book but do obviously declare
support for the arguments presented. Clearly the review is an essay of
support for the poorly researched, historically inaccurate, factually
inaccurate and linguistically inaccurate book written by Mr Malcomson.
On the book itself I have no hesitation in rejecting:
the central thrust of the argument of the book the interpretation of
the symbols as outlined in the book the theory of the origins proposed by
Mr Malcomson the interpretation of the activities of the degree as
outlined in the book the description of the atmosphere and attitude
surrounding the degree the misinterpretation of the plain English language
indulged in by the author the placing on the symbols and activities
meanings totally at variance with the clearly stated position the deeply
hurtful accusations concerning alternative methods of salvation On all the
above items and others Mr Malcomson’s book is inaccurate. The book
itself and your review is a source of grievous hurt to believers, in the
loyal orders, who have not and will not buy into the worst excesses of
American religious extremism so clearly plagiarised by Mr Malcomson.
Yours sincerely,
George Dawson, Ballymena, Co. Antrim (Imperial Grand Master of the
Independent Orange Institution).
Readers response
Back to reviews